Art

The Free-Spirited Amalfi Coast Weekend That Launched Arte Povera

Anne Marie Boetti and Carmine Ableo improvising a small piffero and whistle concert on the Amalfi beach at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Anne Marie Boetti and Carmine Ableo improvising a small piffero and whistle concert on the Amalfi beach at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

For three days in early October 1968, a provincial port about 43 miles south of Naples loomed large in the trajectory of post-war aesthetics. Hosting works by a number of contemporary Italian and international artists—many of whom would come to form the core of —“Arte Povera + Azioni Povere” (loosely translated to “Poor Art + Poor Actions”) purposefully blurred the line between the static exhibition of objects and events unfolding in real time.The works of art installed in the coastal town’s former armory merged with a range of performances and that unfurled in piazzas, side streets, and even from boats in the beach-lined bay.As the third and final installment of a series of exhibitions in Amalfi in as many years—all of them organized and promoted by the young collector and author Marcello Rumma—“Arte Povera + Azioni Povere” proved by far the most consequential. Not only did its self-conscious hybridization of exhibition and event echo well beyond Italy’s shores, but the consolidation of a nascent (and still protean) Arte Povera helped to define the phenomenon even as it expressly resisted definitive contours. A small exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art revisits this milestone of post-war Italian art on its 50th anniversary.
Jan Dibbets installing Linea bianca (White Line) on the water along the Amalfi Coast at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Jan Dibbets installing Linea bianca (White Line) on the water along the Amalfi Coast at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

One year earlier, in 1967, Germano Celant’s manifesto, “Arte Povera: Notes for a Guerilla War,” had identified several related tendencies in contemporary Italian artistic practice, most notably a penchant for unorthodox and “poor” materials, a privileging of process over form, and a rejection of spatial and temporal conventions with regard to exhibition and presentation. While not an official movement or self-proclaimed neo-avant-garde, Celant’s aegis aimed to bring together artists working in a voluntarily “impoverished” vocabulary—of a piece with the late-1960s increasing dematerialization of aesthetics in Europe and the United States, an attempt to liberate art from the exhibition and sale of commodifiable objects. As the first major group exhibition of sorts, “Arte Povera + Azioni Povere”included established Italian artists—such as , , and —alongside the English artist and the Dutch artists and , as well as several individuals only marginally related to Celant’s swelling roster, like and .While it is Celant with whom Arte Povera remains almost exclusively associated, a number of prominent critics participated in Amalfi, including Tommaso Trini, Gillo Dorfles, and Filiberto Menna, among others.
Open Slideshow
4 Images
View Slideshow
The very origins of the event, however, lay with the young collector, editor, and cultural dynamo Marcello Rumma—born in nearby Salerno—in close partnership with his spouse, Lia. Though Marcello had appointed Celant as curator, it was—by the accounts of various individuals present, including the art historian Giovanni Lista—Rumma himself who truly galvanized “Arte Povera + Azioni Povere,” involving artists not simply as expositors of objects, but also as participants in ongoing actions across town. It was also to Rumma that certain artists—including those involved in Pistoletto’s Lo Zoo, a collective of artist-performersaddressed their dissatisfaction with the limiting designation of “Arte Povera”; while they shared many aims with their peers, several feared that the very consecration of a movement went against the grain of their anti-institutional ethos. For his part, would later remark that the event at Amalfi seemed to signal the “nauseous” anticipation of Arte Povera’s end, rather than its beginning.
Alighiero Boetti working on Shaman-Showman at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Alighiero Boetti working on Shaman-Showman at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Shaman-Showman  at Arte Povera, 1968.  Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Shaman-Showman at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

It is undeniable that “Arte Povera + Azioni Povere” marked the “institutionalization” of Arte Povera—its currency as both an aesthetic tendency and a marketing strategy. It is likewise indisputable that the canonization of the various works in question by museums and other official arts institutions strips them of the temporal and physical contingencies that informed their original genesis, presentation, and performance. “Arte Povera,” Celant would declare on the cover of the 1969 volume by the same name, “needs no galleries; it has the world.” Of course, the group’s various artists made widespread use of the gallery system in the years to come. Yet the events at Amalfi constituted the pinnacle of efforts to circumvent and subvert art practices reliant upon traditional modes of reception, circulation, and representation. Art was made to brush up against everyday experience in the most seemingly banal ways.
Indeed, participants would later recount how the act of unloading works that arrived (late) in Amalfi on the backs of several trucks took on the mantle of a quasi-aesthetic act in its own right. The artist Gino Marotta at one point arranged bales of hay in one of the town’s piazzas for a project he titled Giardino all’italiana (“Italian Garden”). Photographs reveal the bales arranged in a kind of square, against which various individuals—including Pistoletto and others—recline and converse surrounded by townsfolk. Marotta’s plein air installation thus formed less an object of contemplation than an ordinary thing: the site of interactions at once staged and effortlessly everyday. By the same token, artists playing soccer next to their own works in the Arsenale (with a makeshift goalpost drawn in white on the walls) proved as illuminating of the event’s ethos as the objects on display—a spontaneity that endowed the weekend with an air of festive collectivity, embodied rather than aridly intellectual.
Michelangelo Pistoletto, Carlo Colnaghi, Carmine Ableo, and Gino Marotta gather inside Giardino all’italiana (Italian Garden),  at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Michelangelo Pistoletto, Carlo Colnaghi, Carmine Ableo, and Gino Marotta gather inside Giardino all’italiana (Italian Garden), at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

This is not to say that “Arte Povera + Azioni Povere” unfurled free of conflict, or even controversy. A growing schism, in fact, emerged between the contingent of artists from Rome and several of their peers, most notably those from Turin—an ideological and theoretical rupture that Rumma and others, unattached to either city, mediated with aplomb. Much of what would become Arte Povera had been incubated in the Piedmont capital, with an alternative exhibition space, the Deposito d’Arte Presente, established by gallery owner Gian Enzo Sperone and collector Marcello Levi as a site of exchange and experimentation. Gathering to its fold artists from other cities and countries, “Arte Povera + Azioni Povere” applied the activities of the Deposito to a larger scale. Some Italian art historians would later insist upon the specifically Italian genealogy of Amalfi’s events, particularly the serate (evenings), whose raucous, often festive atmosphere they recall in their purposeful blurring of staged performance and playful improvisation. Yet such origins can hardly be disentangled from the contemporary prevalence of American-style happenings—an international dimension that “Azioni Povere” plainly courted.
The poised stasis of certain objects in the Arsenale belied often willfully messy and extemporaneous origins. As a kind of metaphor for Arte Povera’s (inevitable?) rigidification from event to object, Pistoletto’s Mappamondo (1966–68)—a sphere of compressed newspapers smoothed by its collective rolling through the streets of Turin—came to rest alongside other objects on display in Amalfi. The installation of works by ArtePoveristi today can similarly strip them of any sense of contingency and volatility, exacerbated at the time by the social and political climate of Italy (and Europe at large) in 1968. If the neat geometries of Boetti’s Catasta (“Stack”)(1967) appears in line with American , the artist’s more performative works, like the Shaman-Showman installation he created at Amalfi—including scrawling these words on a paper-covered pillar—defy any aesthetic categorization.
Ger Van Elk painting a line on the floor with shoe polish at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Ger Van Elk painting a line on the floor with shoe polish at Arte Povera, 1968. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Richard Long, Paolo Icaro, and Francesco Gozzano playing football in the Arsenale. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Richard Long, Paolo Icaro, and Francesco Gozzano playing football in the Arsenale. Photo by Bruno Manconi. Courtesy of Archivo Lia Rumma.

Even still, several of the works evinced, and still retain, a sense of chance within the bounds of their formal and conceptual premise. Mounted in the Arsenale, Pistoletto’s Candles (1967)—featuring dozens of lit candles placed along a reflective strip—still changes with each installation, the light of each wick flickering against their Mylar base. The large bowl of ’s Untitled (1968), for example, bears powdered sulfur, iron shavings, and a magnet, in what was plainly conceived as an interactive work defiant of any fixed form. If Marotta’s hay installation in the streets of Amalfi has long since disappeared, Merz’s 1968 Untitled—with its stack of hay bales mounted by a single rod of neon light—recalls that contemporary intervention and something of its sensory dimensions (the musty smell of hay, the wayward curl of dried blades).
Merz’s Cone (1967) entails the use of relatively unorthodox materials, purposefully redolent of archaic, even “primitivist” culture and craft. Like Merz and Marotta, and the Puglia-born artist (who died in a motorcycle crash just one month before “Arte Povera + Azioni Povere”), many artists involved in Arte Povera (but not necessarily on its roster, like Piero Gilardi) consistently engaged with aspects of Italy’s regional and vernacular culture. This engagement aimed to resist the increasingly consumerist and technocratic elements that had seized post-war Italian culture since the “economic miracle” peaked in the early 1960s. Parallel to the work of poet-director Pier Paolo Pasolini, who celebrated Italy’s subproletariat and southern communities for their exclusion from official culture, many contemporary artists turned to Italy’s south—long seen as “backward” and undeveloped—as a new aesthetic model, precisely in its resistance to the logic of capitalist time.
In addition to its professed affinity with (proverbial) poverty, the very title of “Arte Povera + Azioni Povere” aimed to conflate the coordinates of exhibition and experience—a conflation that significantly influenced two major events of 1969: “When Attitudes Become Form,” curated by Harald Szeemann at the Kunsthalle Bern; and “Op Losse Schroeven” (“On Loose Screws”), curated by Wim Beeren at the Stedelijk Museum. Both exhibitions featured not only installations, but a series of performative interventions by artists. Marcello Rumma died suddenly and tragically the following year, in 1970. Yet he had already founded Rumma Edizioni, a press dedicated to the critical documentation of contemporary aesthetic problems, while his wife went on to found Lia Rumma Gallery in Naples. The couple’s extensive archive, meanwhile, offers vital insights into “Arte Povera + Azioni Povere” and its legacies. The numerous photographs taken by Bruno Manconi of the Arsenale and its environs afford a compelling reconstruction not simply of objects as they sat on display, but of the activities by artists, critics, and visitors that brought them alive.
Ara H. Merjian