
George Segal
Woman with Sunglasses on Bench, 1983
Property from the Miles and Shirley Fiterman Collection
Conceived in 1983, this work is from an …

Whether portraying modern couples sitting in a park (Gay Liberation, 1980), or a biblical family’s unfolding drama (Abraham’s Farewell to Ishmael, 1987), George Segal’s life-size human figures express the fragility of the human condition. Hyperrealism, achieved by making full-body casts of live models using plaster bandages, renders the figures familiar and emotionally resonant. As such, Segal has been seen by some to have rejected the cool calculations of Pop art, despite being considered a prominent exponent of the movement for his casual depictions of contemporary culture and everyday situations. Yet, covered in bright primary colors or whitewash, Segal’s figures emanate an otherworldly strangeness, prompting New York Times critic Roberta Smith to describe them as “emotionally confounding.”

Property from the Miles and Shirley Fiterman Collection
Conceived in 1983, this work is from an edition of 5 plus 2 artist's proofs.
figure 47 x 40 x 39 in. (119.4 x 101.6 x 99.1 cm.)
bench 31 3/4 x 71 7/8 x 22 in. (80.6 x 182.7 x 55.9 cm.)
overall 47 x 71 7/8 x 39 in. (119.4 x 182.7 x 99.1 cm.)
Guaranteed Property …

Whether portraying modern couples sitting in a park (Gay Liberation, 1980), or a biblical family’s unfolding drama (Abraham’s Farewell to Ishmael, 1987), George Segal’s life-size human figures express the fragility of the human condition. Hyperrealism, achieved by making full-body casts of live models using plaster bandages, renders the figures familiar and emotionally resonant. As such, Segal has been seen by some to have rejected the cool calculations of Pop art, despite being considered a prominent exponent of the movement for his casual depictions of contemporary culture and everyday situations. Yet, covered in bright primary colors or whitewash, Segal’s figures emanate an otherworldly strangeness, prompting New York Times critic Roberta Smith to describe them as “emotionally confounding.”